A couple of years ago Stefan Molyneux was telling his young audience to shun every family member and friend who participates in perpetuating the evil of the State through voting. Today he is a devoted supporter of Trump and a FoxNews-like internet talking head pushing the Zionist-neocon agenda of war and the clash of civilisations.
Below is a non-exhaustive collection showing the type of guests he brings on his Youtube “philosophy” show:
Luke Rudkowski promotes Paul Joseph Watson, Milo Yiannopoulos, Lauren Southern and other agents of propaganda who have always been in line with the Zionist-neocon agenda. He even goes with Lauren Southern on street psy-ops of division and agitation:
Luke Rudkowski pushes the same mainstream media disinfo about 9/11 as his longtime gatekeeper buddy Alex Jones:
Luke Rudkowski presents WeAreChange as a group with a purpose to expose secret societies, supranational governance and everything with a pyramid symbol; and yet he is cool with a 32nd-degree Freemason running his organisation [25’50”]:
Luke Rudkowski admits to siphoning off donations [20’00”]:
Luke Rudkowski is another Alex Jone$.
Were the Glazov Gang and Sandra Solomon involved in a scam?
Sandra Solomon was in a car accident recently. She is an anti-Palestinian agent provocateur much like Britain First’s Jayda Fransen and Tommy Robinson of the EDL. She has been busy spewing her hateful bile on Zionist anti-Muslim channels like David Wood’s Acts17Apologetics and on the Glazov Gang.
Previously Sandra Solomon was caught denying being a Christian, after she has been presenting herself as an ex-Muslim convert to Christianity on a number of anti-Muslim pro-Israel outlets.
In this video we show how Sandra Solomon, a Zionist agitator who borders on lunacy, is receiving money that was acquired through inaccurate descriptions of her situation and with the help of the Glazov Gang.
Is this a case of financial fraud, or is it a petty scam fooling only those who wish to be fooled? Whatever the case, it is not necessarily a bad thing the insanely hateful are parted with their hard-earned money.
Exposing Stefan Molyneux as an actor/performance artist/shill, his theatrics, ever-increasing begging and contradictions:
Much like Alex Jones and with themes such as “How They Sabotaged Western Civilization”, Stefan Molyneux has been manipulating his mostly young audience into donating more and more money while giving them self-contradictory and bad advice that is destructive to their relationships, families and society.
After failing to grow his anti-social ‘deFOO’ cult at Freedomain Radio and amassing what was probably a fortune for a documentary he never produced, Stefan Molyneux has turned into a FoxNews-like polarising race baiting talking head and a mouthpiece of the Zionist-neocon-racialist agenda of the clash of civilisations.
This is exemplified in him inviting and nodding to people like Alex Jones, Paul Joseph Watson, Mike Cernovich, Milo Yiannopoulos, ex-Rebel Media’s Lauren Southern, or Charles Murray of the Zionist-neocon group American Enterprise Institute who believes certain racial groups are born lazy unlike Ashkenazi Jews who are genetically superior to everyone else.
Stefan Molyneux’s new gig is to pretend his mission is to save Western civilisation while he cashes in on pitting people against one another and diverts the blame towards smalltime SJW protestors and Alex Jones’ ever-mysterious and elusive bogeymen: the globalists.
Watch Stefan Molyneux’s public Bitcoin balance increase as he tries to give his all for the survival of Western civilisation:
What do the anti-Muslim agents provocateurs/propagandists of the clash of civilisations have in common? All of them never point to the lobbies and influence groups that want more mass immigration/displacement, and all of them are supporters of the colonial apartheid regime of Israel.
Dr. Craig has argued that the Islamic concept of God is morally deficient and inadequate, particularly in comparison to the uncondtionally and universally loving God in Christianity, though the latter is not exactly what one might understand when reading passages like:
However, putting aside the question of scriptural evidence for this concept of God, I wonder if it is not itself morally inadequate and deficient, how it is not the act of loving everyone including the Devil (an embodiment of evil) that is morally deficient.
This is why I sent the following to Dr. Craig hoping that he finds the time to provide some clarification in one of his weekly Q&A posts:
You have argued in some of your work that since God is the greatest conceivable being, since He is morally perfect and since loving is morally better than not loving, that consequently He must be “all-loving”; also, as the greatest conceivably loving being His love must be “unconditional, impartial and universal” even for those who are “damned and who have rejected Him forever”.
– Is it not true then that His love for all includes the Devil? For if it were not the case then there would be at least one eternally damned being whom God does not love or loves less, i.e., He is not all-loving or the greatest conceivably loving being.
– Is it not true that His impartial love is for Jesus as much as it is for the Devil?
– Is it not true that His love for the Devil prior to his fall is the same as it is after the fall, since it is unconditional, not conditioned by the choices of the Devil?
I also hope the answer to this is not the cop-out some Christian apologists have told me, that is, God’s universal love extends to human beings but not non-human beings like the Devil. Because that’s not being all-loving, and the above questions stand in the case of a human devil just the same.