Zionist Agitators in the UK

What do the anti-Muslim agents provocateurs/propagandists of the clash of civilisations have in common? All of them never point to the lobbies and influence groups that want more mass immigration/displacement, and all of them are supporters of the colonial apartheid regime of Israel.

edl bf rebel pegida

My Question to Dr. William Lane Craig

Dr. Craig has argued that the Islamic concept of God is morally deficient and inadequate, particularly in comparison to the uncondtionally and universally loving God in Christianity, though the latter is not exactly what one might understand when reading passages like:

psalm 11 5.png

However, putting aside the question of scriptural evidence for this concept of God, I wonder if it is not itself morally inadequate and deficient, how it is not the act of loving everyone including the Devil (an embodiment of evil) that is morally deficient.

This is why I sent the following to Dr. Craig hoping that he finds the time to provide some clarification in one of his weekly Q&A posts:

You have argued in some of your work that since God is the greatest conceivable being, since He is morally perfect and since loving is morally better than not loving, that consequently He must be “all-loving”; also, as the greatest conceivably loving being His love must be “unconditional, impartial and universal” even for those who are “damned and who have rejected Him forever”.

– Is it not true then that His love for all includes the Devil? For if it were not the case then there would be at least one eternally damned being whom God does not love or loves less, i.e., He is not all-loving or the greatest conceivably loving being.
– Is it not true that His impartial love is for Jesus as much as it is for the Devil?
– Is it not true that His love for the Devil prior to his fall is the same as it is after the fall, since it is unconditional, not conditioned by the choices of the Devil?

I also hope the answer to this is not the cop-out some Christian apologists have told me, that is, God’s universal love extends to human beings but not non-human beings like the Devil. Because that’s not being all-loving, and the above questions stand in the case of a human devil just the same.

Brandon Martinez: Disinfo and Flip-Flopping on False Flag Terror

disinfo thumbnail

After being the only ‘non-aligned’ media disseminating Zionist CBN and Britain First’s propaganda of the clash of civilisations, as documented in the previous video, we now see Brandon Martinez switching from a false-flag/let-it-happen interpretation of some major terror events to them being the doing of blood-thirsty migrants.

This is exemplified in his before and after positions vis-a-vis the attack in the Bataclan concert hall which was allegedly committed by the Abdeslam brothers (who were not migrants by the way).

brandon before and after

The same is demonstrable by contrasting his previous takes on the beheading of the French priest and the truck attack in Nice, against his later affirmations in the video below these screenshots:

church 1

nice 1

nice 2

Likewise, months later Brandon Martinez shifts the blame towards the migrants (note: the alleged terrorists were not migrants but almost all French nationals with French passports who could freely go in and out of France).

This can be seen in this video of Martinez, which I saved before he deleted it from his Youtube channel:

Also, in a piece where he rushed to use DailyMail fake news about a Muslim committing a terror attack in a Spanish supermarket, Martinez seems to attack in very strong terms those who are skeptical of the reporting.

supermarket 1

supermarket 2 small

Thus, not only does Martinez’s Non-Aligned Media show poor, biased sourcing but also a consistent pattern in pushing the narrative of migrant/Muslim terror and in attacking those not yet up-to-date with his new take on terror events.

The significance of this is that after having people go to Western countries through legal, illegal and mass immigration, the next step to engendering the clash of civilisations is by demonising them with propaganda like CBN’s and Britain First’s agents provocateurs. Better yet, ascribe to them false flag terrorism and attack those who are skeptical of the accusations against them.

Ain’t that right, Brandon? thumbsup

Update:

Brandon Martinez has responded to this exposé of his flip-flopping and disinfo with a barrage of tweets the least impertinent of which attempts to rationalise the shifts in his positions with: “I quickly corrected my previous inferences about the Paris attacks when the beheading video came out”.

corrected 1

This is not true. In fact, two months after Martinez published the post that he claims amended his hasty conclusions, he was still characterising the attacks as staged comedy in which patsies were used. See the dates in the screenshots below:

after video 0

after video 1.png

Zero consistency, zero credibility. Q.E.D.

Addendum: You may also like to check the Twitter threads in which Martinez was confronted (click on the dates of the Tweets):